It seems like common sense that pornographers such as Pornhub should be required to ask for identification before selling pornography online. It is much the same as a strip club asking for identification before allowing people inside the premises. But 30 years of a faulty Supreme Court precedent has hitherto allowed online pornographers to get away with lower standards of security than must be met by pornographers in the real rather than virtual world. Fortunately, that is now likely to change thanks to the originalist majority of justices on the Supreme Court.
The court heard oral arguments Wednesday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton. The “Free Speech Coalition” is a coalition of pornographers including Pornhub. Paxton is Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Andrea M. Picciotti-Bayer, National Catholic Register
Diana Chandler, Baptist Press
Does Having Children Make People Happier in the Long Run?
The Porn Gap: Gender Differences in Pornography Use in Couple Relationships
How Dads Affect Their Daughters into Adulthood
What Three Identical Strangers Reveals About Nature and Nurture
The Adult Children of Divorce Find Their Voice
(434) 326-7583
info@ifstudies.org
513 E. Main Street, #1502,
Charlottesville, VA 22902
© 2025 Institute for Family Studies
© 2025 Institute for Family Studies
Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(434) 260-1048
For media inquiries, contact Chris Bullivant (chris@ifstudies.org).
We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.